Hiking Boots vs Sneakers – Unbiased Opinion

Hiking boots being more tough and solid, are always preferred for vigorous hiking. Likewise, hiking sneakers are resilient and more flexible, which helps in miles of running. But there are some apparent differences between both of these footwear.

The main difference is hiking boots are extra durable to withstand wear and tear and the sturdy design helps for keeping longevity around. On the other hand, the sneakers are not very durable and offer a lightweight design. Additionally, hiking boots are protective for feet and toes while sneakers are less protective due to their low-cut ankle design. So, if you ask "Is it better to hike in boots or sneakers?" I would say, always go for hiking boots because they are purposely made for hiking where sneakers are made for general use in your daily routine like walking or going outside with folks.

If you still struggle to see the difference between sneakers and hiking boots, scroll a little more.

Comparison Between Hiking Sneakers vs Boots

FeaturesHiking BootsSneakers
ImageA hiking bootA hiking sneaker
WeightHeavier for day-long wearingLightweight on feet
DurabilityDurable and high-quality material chokeLess durable material and may need to replace more often
Breathability/waterproofPoor breathability but best to keep feet dryBetter ventilation but poor waterproofing
PriceCostly due to  leather uppers and may reach up to $300Reasonable-budget with $100 to $150
ComfortComfortable with added padding cushioning but feel somewhat  stifferLess comfortable for miles of hiking but feel flexible and offer ideal feet functionality
Traction and gripDeep grooves on the sole and ideal tractionLess traction on all terrain
Ankle support/stabilityAnkle support with id, high and low ankle-cut designMinimal support ad compact design
Design and interiorSubtle designs for wearing and best for snow hiking and winter hikes for keeping feet cozy and warmerTrendy designs and color range and suitable for hot weather to keep feet cool  
FittingNeed to break in for a perfect fittingComfortable right out of the box
Best forHiking on abrasive groundsWalking on a smooth surface, such as a gym
Latest CollectionCheck Latest Hiking BootsCheck Latest Sneakers

Hiking Boots Pros and Cons

Pros
  • Durable and sturdy for all terrain
  • Best for traction and non-skid outsole
  • Waterproofing keeps feet dry
  • Supportive ankle design and solid toe box
  • Uppers withstand wear and tear
Cons
  • Expensive
  • May need a break-in
  • Heavy and bulky design

Sneakers Pros and Cons

Pros
  • Lightweight and minimal design
  • A softer interior helps in feet functionality
  • Trendy designs and a range of colors
  • Work best on flat and smooth surfaces
Cons
  • No ankle support
  • Not ideal for keeping feet warm and dry

Details of Hiking Boots vs Hiking Sneakers

And now, let’s dive into the in-depth comparison between hiking boots and sneakers.

1. Weight

The weight of hiking boots is always heavier than any other boots.

Whether you pick lightweight hiking footwear, it would undoubtedly be heavier than trail runners, sneakers, or other such shoes.

The reason is apparent; they feature more padding and material that adds to the weight.

On the other hand, sneakers are softer and offer a bouncy feel to the feet, much more lightweight for day-long walking. Sneakers weigh significantly less than hiking boots.

For instance, this Columbia Women’s Newton Ridge Plus Waterproof Amped, Elk/Mountain Red, 8.5 weighs 2 pounds. In contrast, Skechers Men’s Classic Fit-Delson-Camden Sneaker weighs 11 ounces, so you can clearly see the difference.

2. Design and Build

The design of the hiking boot may look bulky and subtle, but they offer a much-padded interior.

The tongue, collar, and overall hiking boot come with a sober yet bulky design that marks a unique approach to outdoor activities.

Also, sneakers design looks good with your outfits, but there are also some best fashionable hiking boots that suit better on you than sneakers.

In contrast, sneakers are minimal in design, offer the best feet functionality, and come with a resilient interior that aids in walking swiftly.

For example, KEEN Women’s Voyageur Mid Height Breathable Hiking Boots, Brindle/Custard, 8.5 Medium US boot has a bulky and sober design. In contrast, this Skechers Women’s Summits-Quick Getaway Sneaker boot looks trendy and offers a minimal flat build that feels natural on feet.

A Hiking Boot Design Near Ankle
A Hiking Boot Design Near Ankle
A hiking sneaker design near ankle
A Hiking Sneaker Design Near Ankle

3. Breathability and Water Resistance

The water-resistant factor in any outdoor footwear makes it preferable for longer miles of activity. However, some footwear offers you limited quality, for that matter.

For instance, hiking boots are ideal for keeping feet warm and cozy; hence they are best to keep feet dry with the ideal waterproof uppers.

They offer leather, suede, or mixed upper material that is good for water resistance but less breathable than sneakers.

On the flip side, sneakers are less bulky, offering more breathable but less waterproofing.

I bought this Timberland Men’s Anti-Fatigue Hiking Waterproof Leather Mt. Maddsen Boot for myself, and its waterproofing factor was reliable for my feet; however, the breathability was a little compromised for summer hiking.

On the other hand, this Columbia Men’s Fairbanks Low Sneaker was reliable for foot ventilation and keeping the airflow around. I prefer this sneaker for summer outdoor activities.

4. The Outsole, Grip, and Traction

Hiking boots are reasonable for traction. The runner outsoles are best for Holland grip on multiple terrains, making it best for climbing, hiking, ascending, and walking on wet pathways.

On The other hand, sneakers offer flexible feet functionality and a softer interior that allow you to walk on abrasive terrain.

Sneakers have relatively smooth soles compared to hiking boots and work better on flat surfaces such as gym floors or asphalt. 

The outsole of hiking boots works ideally on rocks, stumps, thorns, and other obstacles without hunting your feet, but sneakers may not be a wise option for abrasive ground.

For example, this KEEN Women’s Voyageur Mid Height Breathable Hiking Boots, Brindle/Custard, 8.5 Medium US has advanced traction outsole, and its grip is ideal with 4mm multi-directional lugs for traction is reasonable for hiking. In contrast, Skechers Women’s Low-Top Sneaker has less support and traction but its ideal for smooth surfaces.

5. Ankle Support and Comfort

Hiking boots are best for ankle support especially high-ankle hiking boots that cover the ankle.

Moreover, the plenty of padding and comfortable interior feel best for hiking on rugged cliffs.

However, the heavy boot design may feel odd for day-long wear.

On the other hand, sneakers do not cover ankles, and there are more chances of getting rashes and abrasions on sensitive skin.

For example, this KEEN Utility Men’s Pittsburgh 6″ Steel Toe Non Slip Waterproof has better ankle protection and wraps the ankle in a supportive way while this Dr. Scholl’s Shoes Women’s See Me Sneaker is best for sports and gymming due to its less support for the ankle.

6. Price and Affordability

The price of hiking boots is usually high. The reason is they come with leather uppers that indeed hold more equality against wear and tear.

Hiking shoes are available for $100 to $150, whereas hiking boots are available for $300.

However, some hiking boots feature synthetic mix uppers that hold more quality for durability.

On the other hand, the sneakers are pretty much affordable due to the less material and durability factor.

To relate that with real-time experience, I bought this ECCO Men’s Track 25 High Gore-Tex Hiking Boot, and it cost me $249.95, whereas this Sperry Men’s Striper Ll CVO Sneaker only cost me $65.00, which is a considerable price difference.

7. Fitting

Another factor that sets hiking boots and sneakers apart is the interior fitting.

Whether you pick your precise size in footwear or not, hiking boots usually require a break-in, and you must know how to break in the hiking boot for the best fitting.

On the flip side, sneakers are softer, more comfortable, and fit right out of the box. Therefore they usually don’t need a break-in.

Also, Hiking boots feel stiff at first, while sneakers feel softer, plush, and bouncy under the feet.

For example, this BEARPAW Women’s Olympus Hiker Multiple Colors | Women’s Outdoor | Women’s Hiker Boot The Comfortable Hiking Boot required a break-in due to its stiff interior; however, this PUMA Unisex-Adult Tazon 6 IRI Wn Sneaker didn’t need any break, and I wore it without compromising the comfort.


Check Other Relevant Comparisons


tim

Tim Campbell

I am Tim. Getting the inherited hobby from my father when I was a child to the fully grown individual I always loved boots. I live in hilly areas and love to explore the world at heights. That's where my profound hobby of boots collection comes in. I have tried a lot of boots and now helping my community to do better when having fun in different conditions like hilly areas, work, or farming. In this very blog, I have covered some awesome reviews and information that you may get hard otherwise. All of my self-experience and expert advice I have incorporated in this blog.


Leave a Comment